The Misallocation Problem: What Is An Actual F#ck?

Jul 11, 2026

This is the second installment in what is an ongoing field study in the behavioral economics of emotional resource allocation. Specifically, it examines the fuck: a discrete, measurable unit of cognitive and emotional expenditure that most people spend without a budget, a framework, or any meaningful accounting of returns. The goal is to fix that.

This is a work in progress and your feedback is genuinely useful. If something lands, if something doesn’t, or if you have data to contribute from your own fuck economy, the comments are open.

A few months ago we established a problem. Most people are running their emotional economy completely inverted, spending significant resources on insignificant stimuli and wondering why they’re exhausted. We named the currency. We called it a fuck. If that made you uncomfortable, you’ve had a few months to make peace with it. Today we define it properly.

person holding green and red plastic spoons — Photo by sowmya seva on Unsplash

But before we define the unit, we need to establish something fundamental. Fucks are finite. This is not a motivational claim or a self-help platitude, it is a resource constraint. If you are familiar with Spoon Theory, you already understand the foundation: you wake up every morning with a limited supply of cognitive and emotional energy, everything costs something, and when you are out you are out. Fucks operate on the same principle, with one critical addition. Spoons get spent on whatever the day demands. Fucks are discretionary. Which means misallocation is not just possible, it is epidemic.

This matters because finite resources require a budget. And most people are operating without one.

This distinction matters more than it might appear. Spoons are spent on necessity — getting out of bed, making food, getting through the day. You do not choose to spend spoons on those things. The day requires them and you pay. Fucks operate differently. Nobody requires you to lie awake reconstructing a dinner party conversation from three weeks ago. Nobody is billing you for the ongoing forensic analysis of a coworker’s tone in a Tuesday email. You are doing that voluntarily, with resources that belong to you, toward stimuli that have not earned them. The fuck is discretionary. Which means every misallocated fuck is, at some level, a choice, not always a conscious one, and rarely a malicious one, but a choice nonetheless. That is not a judgment. That is the first useful thing this framework has to offer you. If it is a choice, even partially, it can be changed.

Now let’s establish some operational definitions for the basic unit of this economy, the fuck.

A fuck (n.) — A discrete, measurable unit of cognitive-emotional resource expenditure, characterized by the sustained allocation of attentional, physiological, and/or behavioral energy toward a stimulus event. A fuck is considered present when the individual demonstrates observable indicators of engagement — including but not limited to: rumination, verbal report, somatic arousal, behavioral approach or avoidance, and/or unsolicited opinion-sharing — occurring across at least two independent contexts or time points.

A fuck is considered absent when stimulus contact produces no measurable change in the individual’s cognitive, emotional, or behavioral baseline. This is sometimes referred to as “not giving a fuck,” though clinicians should note that true baseline-zero responses are rare in neurotypical adults and should be assessed carefully before being accepted at face value.

Onset: A fuck is considered to have commenced at the point of initial stimulus contact, defined as the moment the individual first demonstrates a measurable change from cognitive-emotional baseline. In standard presentations onset is concurrent with the stimulus event. In retroactive and intrusive fuck presentations, onset may be significantly delayed and bears no reliable relationship to the timing of the original stimulus.

Offset: A fuck is considered to have concluded when the individual returns to baseline and demonstrates no further observable indicators of engagement across two or more independent observation periods. Clinicians should note that reported offset and actual offset frequently diverge. An individual may report that they are no longer thinking about it. The data may suggest otherwise.

pink pig coin bank on brown wooden table — Photo by Andre Taissin on Unsplash

What does this all mean?

Something happened. You’re still thinking about it. That’s a fuck. If something happened and you genuinely cannot recall what it was an hour later, the system is working correctly. Frame that feeling. It’s rarer than it should be.¹

¹ I defined onset and offset explicitly because I gave enough of a fuck about measurement precision to do so. This is noted as a correct allocation.

In clinical terms, a fuck presents as sustained allocation of attentional, physiological, and behavioral energy. In human terms it feels like this: a low-grade hum of preoccupation that follows you from room to room. It is there when you make coffee. It is there in the car. It surfaces without invitation during unrelated conversations and sits in the background of tasks that deserve your full attention but are not getting it. It is not always loud. In fact the quieter ones are frequently the most expensive, the ones you are not quite aware of until you notice that you are tired in a way that sleep is not fixing. That is the fuck you forgot you were giving. It has been running in the background, drawing from the same finite supply as everything else, for longer than you realize.

To be clear, a fuck is not dramatic by nature. It does not require a crisis. It requires only that something happened and that you are still, measurably, thinking about it.

A person sitting at a desk with a laptop — Photo by Swello on Unsplash

Consider the social media comment thread you recently commented on. Someone was wrong about something you know a great deal about. Not casually wrong, substantially, demonstrably wrong, in public, with confidence. You corrected them. Politely. With sources. Peer reviewed ones. They thanked you, acknowledged your expertise, and continued being wrong. The post is still up. The wrong information is still there, collecting agreement from people who found it first. You have checked it four times today. You have drafted a follow up response. You have not posted it because you know it will not help. You are still going to check it again before bed.

green leafed seedlings on black plastic pots — Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash

Or consider the seedlings you planted this Spring. You started them in February, which required planning, because February requires intention in a way that direct sowing does not. You researched the variety. You sourced the soil. You tracked the light and the moisture and the temperature with the kind of attention you do not give to everything, because you gave a fuck about this. They didn’t make it. Not all of them, maybe not most of them, for reasons that may never be fully clear despite your forensic review of every possible variable. It is June now. The garden has moved on. You have not entirely moved on. Not because of the plants specifically, but because of the fucks you spent on them in February when the ground was still frozen and you were already planning for something that didn’t happen. That investment doesn’t just disappear because the seedlings did.

person sitting in a chair in front of a man — Photo by charlesdeluvio on Unsplash

Sometimes the recognition arrives quietly. You brought the idea to the table before. Multiple times, in multiple rooms, over multiple years. You gave a significant number of fucks about it when nobody else did, which is precisely why you kept bringing it. Eventually you stopped. Not because you stopped caring but because caring without response has a cost and you had other things to fund. Yesterday someone else said it. Differently phrased, same idea. The room lit up. And now it is 2am and you are not giving a fuck about the credit, exactly. You are giving a fuck about all the fucks you spent on this when nobody was listening, and the particular exhaustion of watching those fucks finally pay a dividend into someone else’s account.

That is when you know the fuck was real. It just didn’t get to finish its sentence.

The meeting where one person went quiet at exactly the wrong moment and you have been running interpretations ever since. The text that was read four hours ago and has not been answered. The person at the dinner party who said climate anxiety was overblown, and the response you delivered, and the better response you have been composing since. The sustainable option you didn’t buy because it was forty dollars more, and the small but measurable fuck you give every time you use the thing you bought instead.

None of these are crises. All of them are fucks. The construct does not discriminate by subject matter or stakes. It only requires sustained allocation of attention, energy, or rumination beyond the moment of contact.

You know exactly which ones belong to you.

The cost of misallocation is not simply exhaustion, though exhaustion is reliably present. The more precise cost is opportunity. Every fuck you spend on the comment thread, the seedlings, the nodding room, the text that hasn’t been answered, is a fuck that is no longer available for something else. This is not metaphorical. You have a finite supply. What gets overfunded on the wrong end of the economy gets underfunded on the right end. The relationship that deserved your full attention last Tuesday got what was left over after the forensic analysis. The creative work you claim to care about is receiving the remainder after the social media thread took its cut. The causes that actually align with your values are running on whatever the 2am reconstruction of a stolen idea didn’t consume. You are not failing to care about the right things. You are caring about too many wrong things first, and arriving at the right things already depleted.

That is the misallocation problem. And it has a framework. Though I think it’s important to note, that not all fucks are misallocated. Some things genuinely warrant everything you have. That distinction is precisely what a why need a scale.

So, now that we have established what a fuck is, the obvious question is not whether you are giving them. You are. The question is how many, to what, and whether the allocation is anywhere close to what the situation actually warrants.

For that, we need the scale. Which we will discuss next.

If you enjoyed this and would like to support the effort to build sustainability using behavioral principles, like, follow or subscribe, or Buy Me Coffee! If you’re feeling especially generous, or you are seeking access to 1:1 behavior coaching, consider a paid subscription.